Bach – Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, BWV 565: Analysis

Historic pipe organ in a dimly lit church for Bach’s Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565

A shaft of light falls upon the historic pipe organ, as though the first note of the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, BWV 565 were emerging from silence.

Work Information

Composer:: Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750); traditional attribution, questioned in the literature
Title:: Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565
Year of composition:: Unknown; usually associated with Bach’s early years
First performance:: Unknown
Genre:: Toccata and fugue for organ
Musical Period:: Baroque
Structure:: Toccata – Fugue – free coda
Duration:: approx. 8–10 minutes
Instrumentation:: Pipe organ with pedalboard
First publication:: 1833, Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig

The Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565, handed down under Johann Sebastian Bach’s name, is one of the most instantly recognisable organ works. Many listeners know its opening long before they hear the complete piece. Film, arrangements and recordings have helped to give those first notes an independent cultural life. Yet the composition has much more to offer: the freely paced Toccata leads into a Fugue driven by a more regular flow, before an extended free conclusion restores the character of the opening.

The work’s history is far less certain than its reputation. No autograph score survives, the date of composition is unknown, and no account establishes when it was first performed. Our most important surviving witness is a copy made by Johannes Ringk, which explicitly names Bach as the composer. Scholars have often associated BWV 565 with Bach’s early career, sometimes specifically with his time in Arnstadt. That remains a historical judgement, however, not a date confirmed by an autograph or a contemporary account of its creation.

Questions about authorship arise from particular features of the music: the doubling in octaves, the flexible handling of contrapuntal voices, and figures that resemble string-instrument techniques. Some scholars regard these as unusual for Bach; others understand them in the light of earlier organ traditions or a young composer’s experiments. The debate remains open, but it need not obscure what the surviving score allows us to hear: a carefully connected sequence of movement, interruption, imitation and return.

BWV 565 makes the organ’s possibilities immediately apparent. A line doubled in octaves can sound imposing before any dense polyphony appears. A low note can remain fixed while harmonic tension gathers above it. A rest allows reverberation to continue a phrase, and a fresh statement of the subject shifts attention to another register. Each change can be followed by ear, without reading a score.

The work’s later history helps explain its remarkable reach. Its first publication in 1833 and Mendelssohn’s performances helped bring it back into circulation. Piano transcriptions followed, while Leopold Stokowski’s orchestral version reached a different audience through the 1940 film Fantasia. Those familiar associations are part of the story. Listening to the complete piece reveals something else: the way the freedom of the Toccata prepares the more continuous movement of the Fugue, and how free, declamatory writing returns at the end.

Structure

The Toccata and Fugue form one continuous composition rather than two independent works. After the Fugue comes an extended free conclusion whose character recalls the opening. Dividing the music into Toccata, Fugue and coda therefore gives us a practical listening map, without implying three separate movements.

Region	Principal features	Role in the whole
Toccata	Adagio and rapid passages; octaves, chords and fermatas	Free opening with successive changes of texture and register
Fugue	Semiquaver subject; entries in different voices and episodes	Greater rhythmic continuity with changing contrapuntal density
Free coda	Recitativo and successive changes of tempo	Return to rhetorical delivery and a final arrival in D minor

D minor supplies the principal tonal reference, but changes of texture are equally important to the sense of coherence. The free opening repeatedly stops and starts; the Fugue establishes greater rhythmic continuity; the coda restores pauses and changes of speed. The conclusion consequently returns to a way of presenting musical ideas that the listener already knows.

Musical Analysis

Toccata — Opening gestures, pauses and an expanding register

The Toccata begins with short musical statements separated by held notes, rests and chords. Its opening Adagio allows the organist to give each statement a distinct shape, even though very rapid notes appear within them. From the outset, the listener hears a pattern of motion, interruption and renewed motion. In a resonant building, the organ’s sound may continue through the gaps, giving the pauses an expressive role of their own.

The opening pitch is A, ornamented and doubled at the octave in the edition examined here. A rapid descent towards D follows, with C sharp reinforcing the movement towards the tonic. The same basic gesture reappears lower down. Its successive changes of register enlarge the sound, while the shared melodic direction makes the relationship between the phrases easy to recognise.

Bach, BWV 565, Toccata, bar 1: opening A in octaves, descending notes and fermatas in Rust’s 1867 edition

The example makes the fermatas, brief rests and contrast between sustained notes and rapid descending groups visible. The octaves reinforce a single melodic movement; they do not constitute two independent contrapuntal voices. This helps explain why the opening sounds so substantial even though its musical idea is essentially a single line.

The descent eventually reaches a low D in the pedals, the keyboard played with the feet. Above it, pitches are added successively to create an acute dissonance based on a diminished chord. The low D remains a point of reference while the upper notes create a need for resolution. A temporary arrival on D major provides a clear release before the music continues within its minor-key setting.

The force of this moment depends on more than the dissonant chord itself. First we hear movement without a sustained harmonic foundation; then a low D provides an anchor. Upper notes are added one by one, so we hear the harmony forming in real time. Its eventual resolution carries greater weight because the tension has accumulated gradually rather than arriving in a single attack.

With Prestissimo, the movement becomes more continuous. Related figures occupy the two hands at different pitches, and the rapid succession of notes brings keyboard virtuosity into focus. Sequences repeat a pattern at new pitch levels, extending the phrase without requiring a completely new idea each time. The material remains recognisable as its position on the keyboard changes.

In the passages that follow, the relationship between the hands, the chords and the low pedal notes keeps changing. Sometimes one hand repeats a figure while the other moves more freely; elsewhere the hands travel in parallel. These changes give each rapid passage a distinctive texture. The virtuosity is not simply a matter of speed: it also depends on how the moving lines are supported and combined.

The organ’s ability to hold notes is especially important at the chordal stopping points. The sound remains present after the running figures have ceased, so a change of texture also becomes a change in the listener’s experience of time. Moving notes have led us towards an arrival; the sustained chord now gives that arrival a duration of its own. The performer’s pacing determines how strongly the two stages are connected.

Towards the end of the Toccata, groups of three notes introduce a fresh subdivision of the pulse. Chordal interventions and a brief pedal passage then prepare the close. Tonal support provides a definite boundary before the Fugue begins. The transition is heard above all as a change in musical behaviour: successive gestures give way to an idea capable of continuing and combining with other voices.

Fugue — A subject heard in different positions

The Fugue introduces a steadier flow. Its subject appears alone, allowing the listener to grasp its shape before another voice enters. Semiquavers supply continuity, but within that stream a persistent return to the same pitch stands out. The identifying feature is the alternation of a recurring A with notes that form a descending line.

This alternation creates the impression of two levels within one strand. A returns at regular points while the intervening pitches move downwards and subsequently regroup. The technique has an affinity with string writing, where an open string can alternate with a moving melody. On the organ, the figure already serves effectively as a subject: it is readily recognisable and remains distinct as it passes between voices.

The next entry takes the subject towards the subdominant, G minor, rather than the more customary tonic–dominant relationship. A listener need not identify the key to hear what changes. The familiar figure returns at a different pitch while the first voice continues around it. In this way, the central principle of the fugue becomes audible: a recognisable idea passes from one musical voice to another.

The Fugue does not maintain four equally active voices throughout. Its density changes, and substantial stretches depend on two or three active strands. Nor does the accompanying material revolve around a fixed countersubject that returns unchanged at every entry. Such flexibility keeps the subject’s movement prominent, with different degrees of contrapuntal activity surrounding it.

Between entries, episodes sustain the energy of the semiquavers. Shorter figures are repeated in sequences, lines move into different registers, and parallel thirds or sixths appear. Notes moving together strengthen the harmony and the sense of direction. Contrapuntal writing thus shares the piece with more directly chordal or virtuosic textures, rather than demanding continuous independence from every voice.

These episodes also affect the way a returning subject is perceived. After a lighter passage, a new entry can be recognised with greater ease; after a denser one, the same idea may seem to emerge from within the texture. The listener’s task changes with the writing. Sometimes we follow the subject as a clear foreground line; at other times, its familiar alternation helps us locate it among simultaneous movements.

The broader tonal course reaches more distant areas, including C minor. Such a change becomes especially noticeable when combined with a low entry of the subject. The same idea acquires a different acoustic weight through its association with lower frequencies and pedal articulation. Tonal movement and register work together to renew the music’s intensity.

The pedal solo is a particularly clear point of reference. Without dense participation from the hands, the subject’s melodic construction becomes the centre of attention. The feet’s virtuosity is heard as a complete musical phrase. The withdrawal of other voices matters as much as the low register: material previously heard within combinations is given a space of its own.

When the hands return, the texture becomes fuller again. Towards the close, however, thematic entries gradually cease to be the principal means of organisation. The movement leads to a sustained B flat major chord and then into the passage marked Recitativo. The Fugue’s continuity has fulfilled its role, allowing free declamation to return after the intervening accumulation of movement.

Free conclusion — Pauses regain control of the phrase

The marking Recitativo suggests a manner of delivery related to declamation. Rests and fermatas separate short phrases, rapid groups are interrupted by chords, and the Fugue’s more regular pulse recedes. The change is readily audible because it restores the relationship between movement and waiting established at the beginning.

Successive tempo indications, including Adagissimo, Presto and Molto adagio, give the conclusion distinct internal stages. The rapid gestures do not all serve the same purpose. Some discharge their energy into an immediate pause; others prolong the route towards the final tonic. The heavier chords gain significance through their position within these changes.

At the end, the bass and sustained upper voices shape the last slowing of the music. The final chord retains F natural, preserving D minor rather than supplying the major third heard at the end of many Baroque works in minor keys. Stability comes from the return to the tonic and the cessation of movement. Calling the ending simply a “plagal cadence” does not adequately describe its full harmonic preparation.

The stylus phantasticus and freedom of delivery

The alternation of free and imitative passages links BWV 565 with the stylus phantasticus, a style especially associated with seventeenth-century North German organ music. Works by Dieterich Buxtehude and Nicolaus Bruhns likewise bring together brilliant runs, emphatic chords and fugues within a continuous composition. The contrast between these kinds of writing helps give the music its shape, even when individual passages sound improvised.

The style’s freedom concerns how phrases follow one another and how much room the notation leaves for delivery. The exact duration of a fermata or rest depends on the instrument, the acoustic and the performer’s judgement. The written pitches, harmonic directions and positions of the interruptions still determine the course of the music. The player’s task is to make their relationships intelligible.

This connection helps explain why the return to free writing after the Fugue feels prepared rather than abrupt. The listener has already encountered pauses and sudden changes of pace in the Toccata. When Recitativo appears, those same devices sound different after the long stretch of continuous movement. The relationship with North German practice illuminates the work’s design; on its own, it proves neither where the piece was written nor who composed it.

The organ, registration and the surrounding acoustic

A pipe organ produces sound through air directed into pipes. Stops activate different ranks, offering a range of timbres and pitches, while manuals and pedalboard make different combinations possible. A written note can therefore acquire a different colour and sounding range according to the performer’s choices.

The difference from a piano is fundamental. An organ note can continue for as long as the key remains depressed and air is supplied. Striking the key harder does not provide the pianist’s immediate control over loudness. The organist shapes phrases through articulation, duration, the spacing between notes, choice of keyboard and combinations of stops.

No binding registration plan survives for BWV 565. An organist may maintain a relatively consistent sound, allowing the writing itself to provide contrast, or change combinations of stops to distinguish particular sections. Either choice must serve the music: the fugue subject needs to remain recognisable, and the beginnings and endings of phrases need to be heard clearly.

The building adds a duration of its own. In a highly resonant church, the previous chord may still be audible after the keys have been released. If the next phrase begins too soon, harmonies can overlap and detail disappear. If every pause is prolonged excessively, connections between phrases weaken. Suitable tempos and pauses emerge from the relationship between the music, a particular instrument and a particular room.

This is why two performances with similar overall timings can produce quite different impressions. One may give more space to the opening fermatas and take the Fugue briskly; another may keep the opening more closely connected and allow greater breadth within the contrapuntal writing. Comparing individual transitions is often more revealing than comparing the total number of minutes.

Authorship and the possibility of a lost original

The question of authorship begins with the manuscript evidence. Johannes Ringk’s copy names Bach, which shows that the attribution was already in circulation before the nineteenth-century revival. But the copy is not in Bach’s hand, and we cannot identify with certainty the score Ringk used as his model. Scholars also disagree about its precise date. It is therefore more responsible to describe it broadly as an eighteenth-century copy than to assign a date the evidence cannot securely support.

Another approach is to compare BWV 565 with Bach’s other works. Octave doublings, the absence of a regularly recurring countersubject, and the unusually free treatment of the voices contributed to the doubts systematically discussed by Peter Williams in 1981. Other scholars have argued that these characteristics may reflect youthful experimentation or older organ traditions. Differences from Bach’s mature organ writing call for explanation, but they do not by themselves establish a different composer.

A separate hypothesis proposes that the surviving version derives from a lost work for solo violin. The alternation of a fixed pitch and moving notes, particularly in the fugue subject, can be related to string crossing. This observation helps explain why violin reconstructions have been attempted. A reconstruction demonstrates how the material might work on another instrument; it does not constitute the discovery of the proposed original.

This leaves two separate questions. The first concerns who wrote the music; the second asks whether the organ version we know is a transcription or contains later alterations. Even if an earlier version for another instrument once existed, it would not necessarily have been composed by someone else. Nor has a documented alternative attribution settled the issue. BWV 565 continues to be studied and performed within the Bach tradition, with those uncertainties properly acknowledged.

From organ pipes to piano strings

A piano transcription changes the physics of the sound. Each piano note begins to decay after the hammer strikes, so the sustained presence of organ chords has to be recreated by other means. Pedalling, distribution of voices, doublings and balance between registers assume some of that function.

In Carl Tausig’s transcription, heard in the second video with Evgeny Kissin, the low lines and great chordal climaxes take on the sound of the Romantic concert piano. The pianist can shape individual notes dynamically, but must recreate something of the organ’s sustaining power through pedalling, voicing and the distribution of material between the hands. The most revealing comparisons are specific: the length of the opening dissonance, the clarity of successive fugue entries, and the way tension is carried across a pause.

On the piano, the pedalboard no longer exists as a separate performing region. Its material must be assigned to the hands within a new layout. Nevertheless, the dramatic position of a low subject entry can remain recognisable. The transcription reveals both the durability of the form and those aspects of the experience that depend on the original medium.

🪶 A Chapter in the Life of the Work

A Concert to Build a Monument

At six in the evening on 6 August 1840, Felix Mendelssohn gave an organ recital at St Thomas Church in Leipzig. Already established as a composer and conductor, he appeared that evening as an organist for a particular purpose: to raise funds for a monument to Johann Sebastian Bach. The church was central to the plan. Bach had served there for many years as cantor, and his work had become part of the city’s musical history.

Mendelssohn explained the need for the monument in his announcement of the recital. Leipzig had strong reasons to remember Bach, but still had no public memorial worthy of that connection. Near St Thomas School there was already a monument to Johann Adam Hiller, another musician who had served as cantor there. Mendelssohn appealed to the city’s residents to help honour Bach in a comparable way. The recital was the first practical step in that appeal.

The initiative also drew the support of Robert Schumann, a composer and active music critic in Leipzig. Schumann announced the concert in the press and attended it himself. Beforehand, he had asked whether the initial idea of a commemorative stone might grow into a substantial monument, supported by musicians and music lovers beyond the city. The audience’s response would provide an early indication of what was possible.

Mendelssohn chose music that allowed the audience to hear several sides of Bach’s organ writing. The first half included the great Fugue in E flat major, the chorale setting Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, and the Prelude and Fugue in A minor. After the interval came the Passacaglia in C minor and the Pastorella. The Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565, was the final work by Bach on the programme, before Mendelssohn ended the recital with an improvised fantasy of his own. Heard in this setting, BWV 565 stood alongside chorale writing, counterpoint and large-scale variation rather than being presented as an isolated showpiece.

Schumann’s review appeared about a week later in the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik. He paid particular attention to Mendelssohn’s changes of registration in the Passacaglia and to the coherence of the final improvisation. In that fantasy Mendelssohn drew on a chorale and developed the musical letters B–A–C–H — B flat, A, C and B natural in German note naming — within fugal writing. Schumann thought the improvisation was so completely formed that it could have stood as a published composition.

Towards the end of his account, Schumann recalled another detail from the church: summer light shining through its windows. Alongside his comments on the music and Mendelssohn’s playing, this observation preserves something of the occasion that the printed programme cannot convey. BWV 565 was heard that evening as part of a recital devoted to Bach, long before film and recordings gave its opening a wider fame.

The effort to build the monument continued after the recital. In 1841 another benefit event at St Thomas Church featured Bach’s St Matthew Passion, and the monument was finally unveiled in Leipzig in April 1843. The 1840 concert had thus served a concrete purpose while also bringing Bach’s organ music before a wider public. We do not know when BWV 565 was first performed. We do know that, on that August evening, it was heard in support of the effort to establish a public monument to Bach in the city where he had worked.

🎧 Listening Guide

On a first hearing, listen for three broad changes: the Toccata’s rapid gestures and interruptions, the more continuous unfolding of the fugue subject, and the return of pauses in the conclusion. This outline is useful even when the individual contrapuntal voices are difficult to separate by ear.

At the beginning, listen for the ornamented A and the rapid descent that follows. The gesture returns lower down. Notice how much time the organist leaves after each statement, and whether reverberation remains audible before the next one begins.

When the low D enters, concentrate on the way notes accumulate above it. Harmonic tension takes shape over time and then resolves. Compare this gradual assembly with a later chord whose notes are attacked together.

In the Fugue, first retain the alternation of the recurring pitch and the moving line. At the next entry, look for the same pattern in a different voice. If you lose the subject, wait for the texture to become lighter: its return is easier to recognise when fewer lines are moving at once.

The pedal solo provides a particularly clear opportunity to regain your bearings. Hear the low part as a melody with a direction of its own. Then notice what changes when the hands return: the same instrument becomes denser without requiring a new basic idea.

In the free conclusion, notice when the Fugue’s steady movement gives way to short phrases separated by rests and chords. Listen for the clear return to D minor at the end. Then compare a piano performance: how long can its chords be sustained, and how does the pianist connect phrases despite the natural decay of each note?

🎶 Further Listening

Different performances invite comparisons of instrument, acoustic and the transfer of the music to another medium.

Helmut Walcha — pipe organ, Archiv Produktion. His recording offers an opportunity to follow the Fugue’s continuity closely. Concentrate on recognising entries and on the articulation that allows rapid lines to remain distinct.
Leo van Doeselaar — All of Bach, St Martin’s Church, Groningen. The performance on the Arp Schnitger organ provides a specific encounter between a historical instrument and its surrounding space. Compare the length of opening pauses and the clarity of low lines with the article’s first embedded video.
Evgeny Kissin — Carl Tausig’s piano transcription. The second embedded video makes it possible to compare the piano’s struck sound with the sustained tone of pipes. The opening harmonic accumulation and the redistribution of low subject entries between the hands are especially revealing.
Leopold Stokowski — orchestral transcription in Fantasia, 1940. Follow how an instrument with many available tone colours is replaced by different orchestral groups. Changes of instrumental colour allow certain phrases to stand out differently from their presentation on the organ.

📚 Further Reading

Peter Williams — The Organ Music of J. S. Bach, second edition, 2003. A fundamental study of form, transmission and interpretation in Bach’s organ repertoire. Its consideration of BWV 565 places the work’s peculiarities within broader questions of style and origin.
Jean-Claude Zehnder, editor — Sämtliche Orgelwerke, Volume 4, Breitkopf & Härtel, 2011. This modern critical edition is a useful next step for studying the musical text and its sources. It helps distinguish performing traditions from the decisions embodied in a particular edition.
Russell Stinson — The Reception of Bach’s Organ Works from Mendelssohn to Brahms, 2006. Examines the contributions of Mendelssohn, Schumann, Liszt and Brahms to the dissemination of this music. The Leipzig recital takes its place within a longer history of performances, editions and study.
Fausto Caporali — Sul problema dell’autenticità di BWV 565, 2022. A detailed reconsideration of authorship arguments, referring to the relevant scholarship and historical organ practice. Specific comparisons help assess what a stylistic peculiarity can, and cannot, establish.

🔗 Related Works

Johann Sebastian Bach — Toccata, Adagio and Fugue in C major, BWV 564: a separate slow section creates a different balance between virtuosity, melodic development and counterpoint. Its extended pedal solo offers a productive comparison with BWV 565.
Johann Sebastian Bach — Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582: the returning bass pattern creates coherence through variation. Comparing the works reveals different ways of organising a substantial form on the same instrument.
Dieterich Buxtehude — Prelude in D minor, BuxWV 140: free and imitative passages are connected within a continuous course. It provides a historical reference for changes of texture and rhythmic continuity.
Franz Liszt — Prelude and Fugue on B–A–C–H, S. 260: chromatic harmony and an expanded range of sonorities bring organ writing into the nineteenth century. A subject derived from Bach’s name connects contrapuntal technique with the composer’s later commemoration.
Léon Boëllmann — Toccata from the Suite gothique, Op. 25: continuous rapid movement and a gradual growth in sonority offer a later approach to organ virtuosity. The comparison draws attention to the more interrupted, rhetorical opening of BWV 565.

🎼 Closing Reflection

The opening of BWV 565 is so familiar that recognising it can feel like knowing the whole work. Listening beyond it reveals a different course: pauses that allow sound to linger, a fugue subject travelling between voices, and a free conclusion that recalls the beginning. Those celebrated first notes are an introduction, not a summary, of what the music has to say.

📖 Bibliography and Sources

The analysis was developed through direct reading of Rust’s 1867 edition, with a modern digital typesetting used to cross-check principal formal landmarks. The example reproduces the opening bar of that historical edition and is not presented as an autograph. Schumann’s account supplies the contemporary testimony for the 1840 recital. The authorship discussion distinguishes manuscript attribution from stylistic interpretation. The complete studies listed under Further Reading provide routes for continuing the enquiry.

Scores and manuscript transmission

Bach, Johann Sebastian. Toccata II [BWV 565]. Bach-Gesellschaft-Ausgabe, Vol. XV, edited by Wilhelm Rust. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1867, pp. 267–275. Digital scan IMSLP #01335; source of Example 1.

Bach, Johann Sebastian. Toccata and Fugue in D minor (BWV 565), edited by Miguel Angel Cardozo-Montilla. Caracas, 2017. Plate MCM.1020B.00004.ORG. Digital score IMSLP #488836; consulted for comparison, not reproduced.

Ringk, Johannes, copyist. Toccata Con Fuga, BWV 565. Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz, D-B Mus.ms. Bach P 595, fascicle 8. Eighteenth-century copy; digital descriptions and reproductions through Bach Digital, the Staatsbibliothek and Wikimedia Commons.

Contemporary testimony for the recital

Schumann, Robert. “Mendelssohns Orgelconcert” (1840). Reprinted in Gesammelte Schriften über Musik und Musiker, Vol. II, pp. 273–277. Digital transcription, Wikisource; includes the announcement of 29 July and the account of the recital on 6 August 1840.

Studies and bibliographical verification

Caporali, Fausto. Sul problema dell’autenticità di BWV 565. Arte Organaria e Organistica, XIV, 2022. Republished on the author’s website, 4 January 2023.

Williams, Peter. “BWV565: A toccata in D minor for Organ by J.S.Bach?” Early Music 9, no. 3, July 1981, pp. 330–337. DOI: 10.1093/earlyj/9.3.330. Bibliographical record, Oxford Academic; individual arguments were considered through Caporali’s open reassessment.

Stinson, Russell. The Reception of Bach’s Organ Works from Mendelssohn to Brahms. Oxford University Press, 2006. Publisher preview: introduction and opening of the Mendelssohn chapter.

Breitkopf & Härtel. Publisher’s record for Sämtliche Orgelwerke, Vol. 4, edited by Jean-Claude Zehnder, 2011, EB 8804. Verification of the critical edition’s identity and contents.

Digital and performance resources

International Music Score Library Project (IMSLP). Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565: edition descriptions and digital copies of the scores.

Netherlands Bach Society, All of Bach. Toccata and fugue in D minor, BWV 565, performed by Leo van Doeselaar. Recorded at St Martin’s Church, Groningen, 9 October 2013; released 2 May 2014.

Deutsche Grammophon / Archiv Produktion. Catalogue entry for Bach: Toccata und Fuge BWV 565 / Organworks — Walcha. Details of the recommended recording.

Bach-Museum Leipzig. Bach & Beethoven: Denkmäler & Werkausgaben / Monuments & Complete Editions, section on the first Bach monument, p. 32. Chronology of the fundraising events and the 1843 unveiling.

MusiLLection

Search This Blog