Chopin - Étude Op. 10, No. 12 in C minor, "Revolutionary Étude" (Analysis)

The almost continuous left-hand movement supports the right hand’s melodic voice in Chopin’s Revolutionary Étude. Momentum and the clear articulation of the melody shape the work’s character together. A historically inspired illustration of its piano writing.

i Work Information

Composer:

Frédéric Chopin (1810–1849)

Work:

Étude in C Minor, Op. 10, No. 12, commonly known as the “Revolutionary” Étude

Date of composition:

Approximately 1830–1832; the precise date remains uncertain

First performance:

No specific first public performance has been securely documented

First publication:

1833, as the final piece in the Twelve Études, Op. 10

Dedication:

The Op. 10 collection was dedicated to Franz Liszt

Genre:

Piano étude

Artistic period:

Romanticism

Structure:

A single continuous movement, Allegro con fuoco; a ternary design with an introduction, a varied return and a coda

Duration:

Approximately 2½–3 minutes, depending on the performance

Instrumentation:

Solo piano

---

In Chopin’s Étude in C Minor, Op. 10, No. 12, the left hand sweeps across the keyboard in an almost unbroken stream of semiquavers (sixteenth notes). Above it, the right hand projects a melody in octaves, chords and dotted rhythms: a voice that retains its weight even as rapid notes fill the space around it. The meeting of the two hands gives the work its distinctive power. The running figure supplies momentum, while the melody brings articulation, breath and a sense of purpose.

Chopin unfolds this relationship within a few minutes, drawing on remarkably little material. The opening downward surge prepares the thematic voice; the music then moves away from its original harmonic ground, finds its familiar theme again and carries it towards an ending whose colour can easily escape notice. The final chord is C Major. That change of a single third, from E flat to E natural, takes on particular significance after the journey through C Minor that precedes it.

The name “Revolutionary” has given the music a powerful historical image. The étude is often associated with the Polish uprising of 1830–1831 and the fall of Warsaw, events that deeply distressed Chopin while he was far from home. His anguish is documented in his writings. The familiar account of his composing the étude immediately upon learning of the defeat, in Stuttgart in September 1831, remains an unsubstantiated tradition, and the title “Revolutionary” did not come from the composer. The historical association belongs to the work’s life and reception; the precise circumstances of its creation remain uncertain.

The étude closes the Twelve Études, Op. 10, published in 1833 and dedicated to Franz Liszt. Throughout this collection, each pianistic challenge acquires a musical identity of its own. Here, left-hand agility and endurance are bound up with harmonic movement and depth of sound, while the right hand must sustain the continuity of a phrase that seems almost to declaim. The technical demands are woven into the way the composition thinks and speaks.

The force of the “Revolutionary” becomes easier to understand when the ear follows its internal changes. There are moments when the sound recedes, harmonies move into unfamiliar territory, melodies are varied and returning gestures take on a different meaning. The surface moves quickly. Beneath it, Chopin shapes a journey with clear points of orientation and contrasts subtle enough to reward close attention even at the height of the music’s intensity.

Movements / Structure

The étude comprises 84 bars and is played as one continuous movement. A ternary outline, A–B–A′, offers a useful map: the principal material is introduced, passes through a harmonically unsettled middle section and returns in a varied form. The introductory figuration returns with the theme, so that the reprise recalls the way the whole piece began.

The final region extends beyond a straightforward repetition of the opening. The music continues to develop after the thematic return, preparing the coda. Because the transition from extension to ending is seamless, analytical accounts may place the broader boundary of the coda at different points. The following outline distinguishes the preparation for the close from the last eight bars, where the change of texture and colour becomes especially apparent.

Section	Bars	Musical function
Introduction	1–8	A forceful opening on the dominant, followed by descending figuration that prepares the thematic entrance
Principal thematic region	9–28	The right-hand theme emerges above the flowing left hand, establishing the first expressive contrasts
Central developmental region	29–40	Movement through distant harmonic regions and preparation for the return
Varied return	41–68	The introductory figuration and principal theme reappear, with changes to the melodic and rhythmic writing
Concluding extension	69–76	The return is prolonged, preparing the final change of perspective
Final coda	77–84	Introductory figures reappear in a more restrained sound, followed by a descent in both hands and a close in C Major

The marking Allegro con fuoco calls for a quick tempo and a fiery character. The metre, however, requires a clarification arising from the sources themselves: the autograph has alla breve, 2/2, whereas the first printed editions give the common-time symbol, 4/4. Critical editions explicitly discuss this discrepancy. A sense of two broad beats to the bar gathers the smaller note values into larger movements, allowing the melody to unfold above them without breaking into a succession of minor accents.

Musical Analysis

The introduction: music in search of firm ground

The piano’s first attack immediately establishes tension, while leaving the harmony poised for resolution. What we hear is the dominant seventh of C Minor, the chord G–B–D–F. Its function is to create an expectation of the tonic, the point at which the music might find firm ground. Chopin keeps that expectation alive as the left hand descends rapidly into the instrument’s lower register.

The first descent has the sweep of a gesture carrying the sound along with it. The succession of notes combines scale passages with harmonically shaped figures, while the right hand sets selected notes and chords above the stream. Their weight makes an initial sense of articulation audible within the speed: the movement takes a direction, encounters an accent and continues on its way.

The introduction renews this relationship in successive waves. Each descent seems to bring the energy to a lower limit, and the next impulse opens up the range of sound again. Surges alternate with moments of relaxation, giving every fresh departure its own significance. Dynamic variety has already begun to organise the music before the principal theme appears.

In bars 7–8, rapid notes pass into the right hand as well. To the listener, the change takes place within the continuity of the same movement; for the pianist, it entails a redistribution of roles. The flowing figure has acquired enough independence to move from one hand to the other, and the introduction now makes room for the melodic voice that will emerge above it.

The principal theme: a voice that holds its own within the current

Bar 9 prepares the thematic entrance, and in bar 10 the melody emerges clearly in octaves. The change is immediately audible. Above the left hand’s short, rapid notes come sustained tones and dotted rhythms, giving the phrase an imposing articulation. Time seems to acquire two distinct depths: the left hand fills it continuously, while the right-hand melody shapes it into broader breaths.

The dotted figure is essential to this character. The longer note holds the weight of the phrase; the shorter note that follows gives it an impulse towards the next pitch. Their relationship produces an articulation that can sound like impassioned speech, with moments of insistence and moments of forward movement. When every chord receives the same weight, that direction becomes harder to hear. The melody needs a hierarchy of accents if its utterance is to remain continuous.

C Minor now becomes more firmly established. The left hand connects the bass notes with the middle register, carrying the harmony through its rapid journeys across the keyboard. Each change in the bass can alter the phrase’s foundation even when the surface continues at the same density. Hearing the lower notes reveals a second course beneath the melody: changing supports, chromatic pitches that heighten tension and chords that lead towards the next point of arrival.

The thematic region also contains moments of withdrawal. The sotto voce marking found in the French printed tradition at bar 20 asks for a more restrained voice, while the left-hand movement continues underneath. The theme remains recognisable, but its distance from the listener seems to have changed. A phrase that sounded public and commanding a moment earlier can now become more inward, while retaining the intensity of its direction.

These shifts contribute to the étude’s expressive density. The melody has already spoken with differing degrees of weight, and the harmony has already moved beneath it. By the time the music reaches the central region, the listener knows the material well enough to sense how much its meaning changes in another harmonic setting.

The central region: familiar material loses its original footing

From bar 29, the music moves noticeably away from its opening tonal region. The dotted material retains features of its identity, but its harmony changes. The sharps introduced into the notation form harmonies associated with G-sharp Minor and C-sharp Minor, and the initial sense of support in C Minor recedes.

This change becomes audible through the shifting of entire patterns. The melody appears at a different pitch level, the left hand follows new paths, and the phrases succeed one another with a sense of searching. Harmonic sequences—the repetition of a pattern at new pitch levels—allow familiar material to continue its journey while its point of reference keeps changing. Similarity of shape holds the passage together; displacement sustains its instability.

The listener may feel the effect before identifying it in theoretical terms. The phrase retains its manner of speaking, yet seems to inhabit another setting. In this way, the middle section acquires a developmental function without needing a wholly independent new theme. Its tension grows from the shifting and reconnecting of material already heard.

In bars 33–36, the course turns back towards harmonic regions closer to the home key. Dynamics and the range of the writing contribute to the mounting intensity, while the dominant gradually resumes its role in preparing the return. When the introductory movement is heard again at bar 41, recognition comes with a sense that the music has travelled some distance. The opening material answers an expectation formed during the central section.

The return: the remembered theme takes on new movement

The return begins with the introductory material at bar 41, and from bar 49 the principal thematic region resumes its place. After the preceding harmonic wandering, C Minor provides a recognisable point of orientation. The music recalls its original character, while carrying traces of development into its reappearance: the melody contains additional movement, and the right hand takes a greater part in the rapid surface activity.

Especially characteristic are the triplets woven into the right-hand line. The theme retains the supporting points that make it recognisable, while its articulation becomes more supple between them. Underneath, the left hand continues its stream of semiquavers. The coexistence of different rhythmic subdivisions adds a delicate inner mobility, giving the melody new ways of reaching its high points.

The reprise is thus heard as a varied return. The listener recognises the theme from memory while also perceiving that its expression has changed. Dynamic contrasts continue to distinguish the phrases and shape their relationship, as the music moves towards an ending that will require more space than the first presentation of the material.

The concluding extension and coda: a brief withdrawal before the end

After bar 68, the music continues beyond the span occupied by the first thematic statement. Bars 69–76 prolong the closing process, drawing together the energy generated by the return. The left hand maintains continuity, while the right articulates weightier melodic and chordal points. The music has reached a region of completion, yet its final word is deferred.

In bars 77–80, the dynamics recede, and elements of the introductory writing appear in a more restrained sound. This brief withdrawal changes the aural perspective. Movement is still present, but its earlier force seems to have become more distant. Within this change, the appearance of E natural, the major third above C, becomes particularly significant, casting a different light on the harmony.

The retreat is short-lived. In bars 81–82, the two hands unite in a powerful descent spanning a wide range of the keyboard. The gesture recalls the opening, but its force now belongs to both hands, and its place within the form has changed. In the introduction it opened an unresolved question; here it leads into the final chords, after a journey that has given the same movement thematic and harmonic substance.

The final chord is C Major, with the pitches C–E–G. Ending a work in a minor key with a major third in the tonic chord is associated with the practice known as the tierce de Picardie, or Picardy third. Here, the change is concentrated in the colour of the ending: the major chord is asserted forcefully, with no extended, tranquil section in the new key to follow it.

The harmonic closure is clear, while its expressive meaning leaves room for interpretation. The major third may sound like a momentary change of light, a more unyielding final statement, or a decisive closing of all that has preceded it. The score supports the change of colour and the force of the conclusion. A word such as “victory” would give the music a specific programmatic meaning beyond anything the composer declared.

The étude as a composition for the whole pianist

The left hand stands at the centre of the technical challenge, but the work’s deeper demands emerge when its rapid movement acquires musical depth. The figures cover a wide range, require continual changes of position and test the pianist’s endurance. Their flow depends on economy of movement; their meaning depends on differentiation of sound.

The low notes carry a different weight from the intervening notes that follow them. The harmonic foundation needs to remain perceptible as the hand moves into the middle register and returns. The writing thus creates a harmonic foundation within the motion itself. Notes are played in succession, yet the listener also hears their relationship to a chordal support that lasts longer than any individual note.

This distinction is part of the étude’s pianistic substance. Evenness in the smaller note values allows continuity, while a hierarchy of pitches reveals direction. If every semiquaver receives the same weight, the texture becomes dense and its harmonic course harder to distinguish. When the bass foundation and inner movement remain audible as distinct elements, the same speed can be heard with greater transparency.

The right hand has to sustain a different kind of continuity. In its octaves and chords, the upper melodic note must connect to the next, even as the remaining notes change in weight or the phrase is enriched with rapid variations. Independence of the hands is therefore also an independence of listening: one organises the harmonic flow, the other sustains the melodic utterance, and the overall direction emerges from their cooperation.

The pedal plays a decisive part in bringing them together. Sustaining the bass can connect the low foundation with the movement that follows, but an accumulation of sound can obscure the changing harmony. On a modern piano, whose resonance differs in duration and density from that of instruments in Chopin’s time, judgement depends on what is actually heard. Mastering the étude includes precisely this attentiveness: the ability to preserve momentum, phrasing and clarity within a single performance.

Intensity has breath and memory

The almost continuous stream of semiquavers gives the work a persistent sense of motion. Within it, however, the music changes state. A phrase recedes dynamically, a harmony unsettles its foundation, a familiar figure returns at another pitch or with additional notes. The persistence of movement makes these changes more compelling, allowing them to be compared against a background that remains recognisable.

The form organises that comparison through musical memory. The first appearance of the theme gives the listener points of reference; the middle region changes their surroundings; the reprise makes it possible to recognise what has remained and what has altered. The coda adds one last shift of perspective. The work’s brevity increases the significance of these moments, since each affects our perception of the whole journey.

Reading the sources reveals how finely that journey can be shaped. The autograph and printed editions differ in their dynamics, slurs and verbal instructions. Modern critical editions consider when a difference represents a revision by the composer and when it may have arisen through an omission in engraving. The question of 2/2 and 4/4 belongs to the same history of transmission: a small change in the printed symbol can affect the way a performer groups the movement.

In listening, the consequences of these details meet in the phrasing. Quiet dynamics place the voice at another distance, broader pulses unite the surface, and climaxes gain weight through their preparation. The “Revolutionary” retains its momentum while allowing its inner contours to be heard: the ways in which it remembers, transforms and brings to a close what it has already said.

🪶 A Chapter in the Life of the Work

A Journey Without a Homecoming

On 2 November 1830, Chopin left Warsaw. He was twenty years old and had already presented his two piano concertos in the city. The next step in his career would take him into a wider musical world, away from the people who had witnessed its beginnings. Along the way he met his friend Tytus Woyciechowski, and the two travelled on towards Vienna. At that moment, the departure still belonged to the life of a young musician seeking opportunities abroad. Only through what followed would the journey become the one from which he never returned to Poland.

Less than a month after he had left, Warsaw became the centre of the November Uprising. On the night of 29–30 November 1830, the revolt against Russian rule began. The news reached the two friends in Vienna and changed their relationship with the road they had just travelled. Woyciechowski returned home to take part; Chopin remained abroad, his friend having discouraged him from returning as well.

Vienna continued to offer musical acquaintances and social encounters, but Chopin’s letters reveal a life that had acquired a second, persistent centre of gravity. The people he worried about were elsewhere, and news reached him without allowing him any part in the events themselves. In a letter to Jan Matuszyński on 26 December, he described the difference between the composure he showed in the drawing room and the intensity he expressed at the piano when he came home. His musical life and his anxiety for Poland had begun to inhabit the same daily existence.

The months passed, and the uprising developed into an armed conflict. In July 1831, Chopin left Vienna and set out for Paris. The route took him through Linz, Salzburg, Munich and Stuttgart, while the situation in his homeland remained unresolved. He had left to find his place as a pianist and composer. Now he was continuing a journey whose future also depended on events unfolding far beyond his reach.

In September, Russian forces captured Warsaw. The notes associated with his stay in Stuttgart preserve his reaction with an immediacy that a historical summary cannot convey. The city appears through its people: his father, his mother, his sisters and the friends he fears may have been killed or taken prisoner. Distance allows the most terrible possibilities to occupy the space where reliable news is missing.

This is the most painful aspect of the testimony. Chopin writes questions about the fate of those close to him, and the images surrounding them reveal the extent of his fear. They need to be read as fears born of uncertainty, rather than confirmed reports of what happened to his family. News of the city’s fall has arrived; knowledge of the lives of those he loves has yet to become equally clear.

Amid these thoughts, the piano appears as the place where his grief finds expression. The reference connects music-making with his anguish, without naming a particular composition. A reader familiar with the Étude in C Minor can easily bring the testimony and the music together. Yet the text itself lacks the information that would establish that this was the very moment in which the étude came into being.

Chopin continued to Paris and settled there in the autumn of 1831. His musical work found a new setting, and in 1833 the Twelve Études, Op. 10, appeared in printed editions in France, Germany and England. The C Minor étude closed the collection, with no “Revolutionary” title supplied by the composer in the original sources. Publication gives us a secure point in the work’s public life, while the precise course of its composition remains less clear.

Around that gap, the historical association grew into a complete story. Stuttgart, the fall of Warsaw, the written despair and the music’s dramatic character could be joined in a narrative in which Chopin sat at the piano and answered the news with the étude. The story gained force because it connected real events with a sound that seemed to belong to them. The bridge between the two, however, remains conjectural: the sources document Chopin’s anguish without securely identifying the day and place in which this particular composition was written.

That uncertainty allows the testimony and the music to retain their own voices. The young musician who left Warsaw would go on living far from it, and his homeland would remain present in his life. When the étude’s theme is heard again above the persistent left-hand movement, it may meet that experience of distance in our own listening. The phrase has enough strength to enter into conversation with history, even when history cannot tell us the exact moment in which it was written.

---

🎧 Listening Guide

The first attack and the successive waves. The opening chord leaves an expectation unresolved, and the left hand’s rapid descent prolongs it in sound. The low register reached by the movement, the renewed impulse that follows and the changing dynamics make the first bars audible as a succession of waves, each carrying a different weight.

The melody’s broader breaths. With the arrival of the right-hand octaves, the phrase acquires clear articulation above the semiquavers. The dotted rhythm makes it possible to distinguish the notes that hold its weight from the smaller movements that carry it forward. On a second hearing, attention to the upper melodic notes of the chords reveals a line that breathes on a larger scale than the rapid texture beneath it.

The voice at changing distances. At certain points, the dynamics recede while the left-hand movement continues. The phrase can then sound closer to an inward utterance. The contrast becomes especially apparent when greater force returns, because the listener has just encountered the same material at another level of intensity.

Wandering and recognition. From bar 29, familiar patterns move into a different harmonic setting. The reappearance of the introductory figuration at bar 41 provides the first strong point of return, and the theme soon afterwards completes the recognition. The additional movement and right-hand triplets allow similarity and change to be heard at the same time.

The brief withdrawal and the final colour. At the beginning of the final coda, the music grows quieter before the descent shared by both hands. This small change of perspective makes the last outburst more distinct. In the closing chord, E natural gives C its major colour, and the ear can dwell for a moment on that change before assigning it any historical or emotional meaning.

🎶 Further Listening

• Khatia Buniatishvili — Étude Op. 10, No. 12, live at the iTunes Festival, 2014. The selected video offers a view of the work in performance, making it possible to follow the left hand’s journeys across the keyboard and the right hand’s contrasting articulation. Comparing the introduction with the final descent in both hands illuminates the relationship between pianistic movement and form.
• Maurizio Pollini — Études, Op. 10 and Op. 25, Deutsche Grammophon. The clarity of the texture helps the ear distinguish harmonic changes beneath the rapid surface. This interpretation is particularly rewarding for following the relationship between the steadiness of the pulse and the direction of the larger phrases.
• Seong-Jin Cho — Étude Op. 10, No. 12, Deutsche Grammophon, 2021 release. A contemporary interpretative perspective for comparing the articulation of the dotted theme and the balance between the hands. The weight of the chords and the duration of the melody’s high points offer specific ways into the shaping of the phrase.

📚 Further Reading

• Jan Ekier and Paweł Kamiński — Études, National Edition, Series A, Volume II. The critical edition and its English performance and source commentaries offer a path into the study of metre, differences between the autograph and printed sources, and performance instructions. Reading them alongside the score reveals how editorial decisions influence the pianist’s understanding of the work.
• Roy Howat — editor of 12 Études, Op. 10, The Complete Chopin: A New Critical Edition, Edition Peters, 2023. Particularly useful for understanding the problems of the first French edition. The extended Critical Commentary follows details of dynamics, phrasing and rhythmic notation that can significantly alter the interpretative picture of the twelfth étude.
• David Damschroder — Harmony in Chopin, Cambridge University Press, 2015. Chapter 4, “Étude in C Minor (op. 10, no. 12),” pp. 145–156, addresses this work specifically and offers a focused route into more advanced harmonic study. It assumes greater familiarity with analytical terminology and allows the reader to continue beyond the orientation provided by this article.

🔗 Related Works

• Frédéric Chopin — Étude in F Minor, Op. 10, No. 9: Here, the wide-ranging left-hand writing supports a melodic voice with a different expressive character. The comparison reveals how a related technical challenge can produce another relationship between movement, breath and the weight of a phrase.
• Frédéric Chopin — Étude in C Minor, Op. 25, No. 12: The same home key acquires a broader pianistic dimension, with great waves of arpeggios in both hands. Hearing the two works in succession illuminates different ways in which a melody can emerge from a powerful, continuously moving texture.
• Frédéric Chopin — Prelude in D Minor, Op. 28, No. 24: The persistent left-hand movement and intense right-hand voice create a related dramatic relationship in an even more concentrated form. The prelude offers a musical point of comparison independently of the historical traditions that have associated both works with 1831.
• Ludwig van Beethoven — Piano Sonata No. 32 in C Minor, Op. 111, first movement: The comparison opens a path into the study of dramatic writing in C Minor and the significance of a major-key ending. This affinity offers an analytical approach to listening without presupposing any proven borrowing by Chopin.
• Alexander Scriabin — Étude in D-sharp Minor, Op. 8, No. 12: The imposing melody above an active left hand offers a later instance of the étude as an intense musical statement. Its different harmonic language and the scope of its piano writing reshape the experience of preparation and climax.

🎼 Closing Reflection

Speed can fill a room, yet a phrase can remain clear within it, breathing in its own time. In Chopin’s étude, that voice reaches us through the continuous movement and leaves behind more than a memory of its force. The final major colour lasts only a moment, but long enough for the meaning of the ending to remain open within us.

---

📖 References & Sources

The analysis is based on a reading of the score, with editorial details checked against the source commentaries of the National Edition and Roy Howat’s critical edition. Particular points of attention were the difference in metre between the autograph and first editions, the variations in the reprise and the final major chord. The historical narrative draws on the Stuttgart notes and the chronology of the Fryderyk Chopin Society, distinguishing the composer’s documented anguish from the tradition that directly links it to the composition of the étude. Expressive descriptions are proposed readings of the music. The titles under Further Reading offer selected routes for continued study and do not imply consultation of the complete contents of every recommended book.

Score and critical documentation

• Chopin, Frédéric. Étude in C minor, Op. 10, No. 12. Digital score transcription, IMSLP, file no. 131342, four pages. Used to map the 84 bars; editorial details were checked against the critical commentaries below.
• Ekier, Jan, and Paweł Kamiński. Études, National Edition, Series A, Volume II. Foundation for the National Edition, second edition, 2000. Performance Commentary and Source Commentary, English digital supplement; particularly the comments on Étude Op. 10, No. 12.
• Howat, Roy, ed. 12 Études, Op. 10. The Complete Chopin: A New Critical Edition. Edition Peters, 2023, EP 73227. Extended Critical Commentary, particularly the introduction on sources and metre and the comments on the twelfth étude.

Primary historical testimony

• Chopin, Fryderyk. Album-diary notes associated with Stuttgart and the news of the capture of Warsaw, September 1831. Polish text: Zapiski Fryderyka Chopina z albumu-dziennika, na wieść o zdobyciu Warszawy przez Rosjan w 1831 roku, digital transcription at Wikiźródła.
• Chopin, Fryderyk. Letter to Jan Matuszyński, Vienna, 26 December 1830. The reference to his social composure and the intensity of his expression at the piano was consulted through the chronology at chopin.pl; it is paraphrased here rather than presented as a direct English quotation from the composer.

Historical and digital sources

• Towarzystwo im. Fryderyka Chopina. Chronology of Chopin’s life and work, sections covering 1830–1833, chopin.pl.
• Towarzystwo im. Fryderyka Chopina. Chopin and his times, chopin.pl. Historical context for the November Uprising and Chopin’s time abroad.
• G. Henle Verlag. Etude c minor op. 10 no. 12 (Revolution), HN 658, edited by Ewald Zimmermann. Editorial presentation identifying the tradition of composition in September 1831 as unsubstantiated.
• Chopin Online. Annotated Catalogue of Chopin’s First Editions and the digital catalogue entry for the French edition of the Op. 10 Études.

Recording documentation

• Buniatishvili, Khatia. Étude Op. 10, No. 12, “Revolutionary.” Video whose title identifies a live performance at the iTunes Festival on 30 September 2014. YouTube ID: zMIFAFJ0FG4.
• Pollini, Maurizio. Chopin: Études, Op. 10 & Op. 25. Deutsche Grammophon; official listing for the 2016 reissue, UPC 00028947963318.
• Cho, Seong-Jin. Chopin: Études, Op. 10: No. 12 in C Minor, “Revolutionary.” Deutsche Grammophon, 2021; official digital release from Universal Music Group.

A note on editions

The autograph and first editions contain differences that modern critical editions assess according to differing priorities among the sources. For individual dynamics, slurs and certain rhythmic details, the edition being used needs to be taken into account. The broad formal course, thematic returns and final C Major chord remain clear points of reference for the analysis.